Clear AI-Act — The European AI Act audit trail
FREN

Clear AI-Act · The European AI Act audit trail

Every AI Act audit conclusion, linked to its source.

Clear AI-Act organises the audit by department and AI system, records every evidence item, quotation, contradiction and sign-off, proposes recommendations for the auditor to judge, and delivers a fully verifiable audit file.

Launch the demo The product
The Clear AI-Act audit trail The engagement is scoped by organisation, department, process, task and AI system. Seven families of evidence items attach to it and enter the audit file with a hash, an extraction, a proposed classification, a version and a reading coverage. Each passage is classified as public, anonymised or confidential; a confidential passage does not leave the audit file. An exact quotation grounds an assertion linked to the AI Act framework. A counter-evidence opens a contradiction, arbitrated by a reasoned sign-off, then a deterministic check classifies each point. Delivery produces the recommendations, the review report and the manifest. A public Article 50 pre-study, specialist models under human oversight and export of the audit file complete the journey. A dated journal chained by hashes runs from scoping to delivery. New version of an evidence item the sign-offs that depend on it become “to be reviewed” 00 · Scoping 01 · Evidence items 02 · Audit file 03 · Classification 04 · Finding 05 · Review 06 · Delivery Organisationentity, sector, country Departments HR Finance Marketing Purchasing Customer service Process Tasks System, data, AIsolution, version, use,audience Each evidence item attaches to the level it documents. Policies, proceduresPDF · DOCX · text Technical filesystem sheets, analyses Audio interviewstimestamped consenttranscription on the devicehuman qualification,versioned and revocable Digitised documentsOCR reading Web pagesnotices, conditions Logs and registersoperational exports Questionnairesanswers, written exchanges SHA-256 hash9f2c…a41e Text extractiontext, OCR, transcription Proposed classificationfiling, to be confirmed Versionv1 → v2 → v3 retained Reading coverage complete partial unavailable C2 · Confidentialremains in the audit file C1 · Anonymisedmay leave, on decision C0 · Publicmay leave, on decision External servicezero budget by default The classification is set by the auditor; a C2 passage is blocked. Exact quotationlocated to the nearest byte Assertiontied to item and version AI Act frameworkRegulation (EU) 2024/1689 Art. 9 Art. 10 Art. 13 Art. 14 Art. 26 Art. 50 Annex III dated framework, sources verified, activated after review Counter-evidenceanother item qualifies it Contradictionopen, to be resolved Arbitration and sign-offauthor, reason, date Deterministic check documented to be requested excluded Recommendations strategic andoperational, byorganisation, department,process and system Review report findings, reservations,reasoned decisionsreadable and printable Manifest evidence items, hashes,versions, reading coverage,contradictions, sign-offs,limits Public Article 50 pre-study 9 categories × 8 angles: 72 reconnaissance tasks on a bounded public scope. Each indication is qualified: fact, indication, inference or point to confirm; it feeds the findings. Specialist models approved context, double confirmation, a cap on the budget; the answer remains a proposal. Audit file export REVUE.htmlDOSSIER.jsonMANIFESTE.json encrypted USB drives;timestamped manifestqualified eIDAS scoped engagement evidence item received hash, version classified passage assertion created sign-off recorded delivery prepared The trail: every action is recorded in the log, dated and hash-chained, from engagement scoping to delivery.
From scoping to delivery: organisation, departments, processes and systems; evidence items, hashes, extraction, versions, filing; citations, AI Act articles, contradictions, sign-offs, review; recommendations, report and manifest, in a single trail.